
It's a Vancouver landmark and it's one that many people would be sad to see go. It's also a rather hefty safety hazard and it may not necessarily be safe to leave it in place, especially with tourists walking in and around it on a daily basis. The last thing the city wants is a lawsuit.
Even so, the Vancouver city board has decided to spare the life of the Hollow Tree in Stanley Park for the time being. The cedar tree is about a thousand years old and it was earmarked for destruction only a short while ago. They were going to chop it down along with 70 other trees in Queen Elizabeth Park. The schedule called for the Hollow Tree to go down before Canada Day long weekend.
Then the city faced strong opposition and now the park board has voted "to delay the removal for 150 days." This doesn't mean that the tree is going to stay there, but they are going to re-evaluate the possible options.
Source: Canada.com
Recent Entries:
· Celebration of Light Fireworks Makes Another Comeback
· Views of Vancouver: Point Atkinson Lighthouse
· Views of Vancouver: Yaletown
The tipping point for a city on the rise.
EDITORS
Jess
Marc
Diandra King
send tips/stories to
contact us
click here.
LANGUAGE
En Français
SYNDICATION
All feeds: click here.
DAILYPIXEL NETWORK
2010Vancouver.ca
Airport.ca
Archive.ca
BallPimp.ca
CityGuide.ca/CALGARY
Canuck.ca
Dailypixel.ca
Dial.ca
Engagements.ca
FluPandemic.ca
Footblog.ca
Forks.ca
Gadget.ca
Gimme.ca
Greetings.ca
Hell.ca
Hugg.ca
CityGuide.ca/KELOWNA
Lease.ca
Meme.ca
Naturopath.ca
PrimeMinister.ca
Profit.ca
RRSPS.ca
SearchEngine.ca
Stare.ca
Stylish.ca
Superwoman.ca
CityGuide.ca/TORONTO
Video.ca
VirtualReality.ca
Wager.ca
TAGS
Tag Cloud
DATE-BASED
March 2009 (2)
February 2009 (5)
January 2009 (18)
December 2008 (27)
November 2008 (24)
October 2008 (47)
September 2008 (62)
August 2008 (66)
July 2008 (68)
June 2008 (35)
May 2008 (31)
April 2008 (42)
March 2008 (28)
February 2008 (21)
January 2008 (23)
December 2007 (15)
November 2007 (17)
October 2007 (22)
September 2007 (19)
August 2007 (26)
July 2007 (33)
June 2007 (32)
[ READER COMMENTS ]